Reviewer comments to author example

Reviewer comments to author example

Reviewers’ Comments and Authors Response Paper number: ADHOC-D Paper title: Reverse Back-off Mechanism for Safety Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks Authors: R. Stanica, E. Chaput, and A.-L. Beylot The authors would like to thank the area editor and the reviewers for their precious time and invaluable comments. We have carefully addressed all the comments. The corresponding changes Blind Comments to Author, and Reviewer Confidential Comments to Editor). Details about the four sections are as follows: 1. Recommendation - At the top please provide your recommendation with the following choices available in a drop down menu (see figure 4): Accept, Reject, Major Revisions, or Minor Revisions. Please note if you select “Major Revision” and the editors agree the paper Below is an actual example of a comment my co-authors and I received from one reviewer submitting our paper to a geophysical research journal. Pay close attention to the structure of the response of the reviewer’s comment considering the font, line spacing, tone, and how we have addressed the reviewer’s main concerns. We did not fully agree

How to respond to reviewers’ comments: A practical guide for authors – Language Editing

Marc Chiaccio, PhD in Climate Science from the Swiss Institute of Technology ETH in Zurich Switzerland, has worked in various institutes around the world, including NASA, International Centre for Theoretical Physics ICTPand the University of Sweden.

He has more than a decade of experience writing scientific articles for international reviewer comments to author example as well as writing science lessons for students. Becoming a successful researcher in the natural sciences means not only conducting novel and important research, reviewer comments to author example, but also responding effectively to the comments of the journal editors and reviewers in an appropriate and proactive manner.

I learned early on that answering a reviewer comments to author example comment with a one-sentence response was not going to cut it. I needed to make sure I understood the questions the reviewer was asking so that I could answer their questions and address their concerns effectively. We will include an example from an actual comment made by a reviewer during a manuscript submission to a climate science journal.

Knowing how to deftly handle a rebuttal letter is one of the most important skills you will need to become a successful researcher. If you pass this stage and the paper has not reviewer comments to author example flat out rejected, a rebuttal letter will be attached to the review of your paper.

Hopefully, the aim of your paper matches closely to that of the selected target journal and your paper has enough merit not to be initially rejected.

Much of the time, especially if you are new to research, you will be faced with such a rebuttal letter from the editor that can include many comments from up to three or four reviewers. How you respond to this letter determines whether or not the editor accepts or declines your manuscript.

Below is the information that should be included in the rebuttal letter for a continued and successful review of your manuscript:. This includes everything from comments pointing out minor errors such as leaving out the year in a citation, to questions about the appropriateness of methodology.

On one occasion, I attempted to convince the editor that the scientific method I applied was the one most appropriate for testing the research hypothesis. Below is an actual example of a comment my co-authors and I received from one reviewer submitting our paper to a geophysical research journal. We did not fully agree with the desired requests of the reviewer, but we clearly stated our reasons along with relevant arguments and references.

We also did a quick check to give further confidence to our findings. Dimming and brightening: I found this part less convincing than the rest of the paper. The authors should instead use ground-based measurements, such as stations from the BSRN and GEBA networks, that have been recently homogenized Sanchez-Lorenzo et al.

As explained in section 2. The CERES dataset as explained in section 2. Thus, this is the reason we use these satellite products and our reason for going in detail in the dimming and brightening section between trends of these datasets. We also wanted to show how useful such satellite products are in these modeling assessments because as we point out in linessatellites provide a greater spatial coverage than ground based measurements with better precision than reanalysis data Qin et al.

As a check however, we have evaluated the available BSRN stations over the common period for eight different stations in Europe. From my many years of experience of answering the comments of editors and reviewers, I will argue that it is very important that you respond to ALL comments made by the reviewers. It is worthwhile to make sure you have left nothing out for any comment, even if it concerns a minor issue. There will be times when you will completely disagree with a reviewer, but it is better to show that you have at least considered their recommendation; and if you still disagree, provide clear reasons why you disagree and provide references, reviewer comments to author example.

This is critical, as it shows that you are willing to work with them to improve your paper, and at the same time it demonstrates your expertise and knowledge of the literature reviewer comments to author example that scientific area. If you strongly disagree with the editor or a reviewer on a particular major comment, for example, reviewer comments to author example, and one that would require major revision, you can always let the editor know first—but remember to use a softened tone in your writing and argue your point in a way that clearly shows your expertise.

The more you adhere to the advice reviewer comments to author example in this article, the greater the likelihood of your paper being published. Writing a successful reviewer comments to author example letter is one of the most important steps you will take during your research career. Good luck! Remember Me. Sign in. Sign in with Facebook Sign in with Google. Forgot your password? Register Sign in English 한국어 简体中文 繁體中文 日本語 Türkçe.

Sign in Register. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES 한국 KOREA 中国 CHINA 台灣 TAIWAN 日本 JAPAN TÜRKIYE TURKEY, reviewer comments to author example. Services Academic - Academic Reviewer comments to author example Services · Manuscript Editing Services · Premium Academic Editing Service - Professional Proofreading Services Admission - Admission Essay Editing Services · Graduate School Admissions Essay Editing Services · College Admissions Essay Editing Services · Premium Admissions Editing Service University Assignments - University Assignments Editing Services Business - Business and Corporate Editing Services.

Academic Editing Pricing Admissions Editing Pricing University Assignments Editing Pricing Partner Discount. About Us Our Editors Client Reviews Affiliate Program Wordvice Jobs. ORDER NOW. Home Responding to Reviewer Comments on Your Manuscript: Example from a Climate Science Journal Rebuttal Letter.

Academic Resources. Writing Help Center Writing and Publishing FAQ Quick Writing and Editing Tips Advice from Research Experts, reviewer comments to author example. Writing and Grammar Composition and Grammar Tips Additional Academic Resources. Online Courses Academic Instructional Videos Webinars and Seminars.

Manuscript Preparation Style and Formatting Structure and Organization Research Writing and Grammar. Journal Submissions Publication Planning Publication Ethics.

Responding to Reviewer Comments on Your Manuscript: Example from a Climate Science Journal Rebuttal Letter. Enter your email to receive a discount code. Reviewer comments to author example will not send other content to your inbox.

READ MORE. Get your instant quote! Service Type Choose an option…. Document Type Choose an option…. Word Count. Remember Me Sign in Sign in with Facebook. Sign in with Google. Register Forgot your password?

Word: Track Changes and Comments

, time: 4:20

Giving an effective peer review: sample framework and comments

REVIEWER COMMENTS Reviewer #1 (Remarks to the Author): This is a very interesting paper about polarimetric properties of interstellar comet 2I/Borisov. This amazing object has been the subject of many studies, as it entered our Solar System by the end of and has been close enough to the Earth for a significant period of time so that detailed observations were possible. Polarimetric To find other examples, check the journals that publish the correspondence between authors, reviewers, and journal editors. Responding to reviewers: Advice from the perspective of a language editor When you respond to reviewers’ comments, maintain a positive attitude and be open to criticism Blind Comments to Author, and Reviewer Confidential Comments to Editor). Details about the four sections are as follows: 1. Recommendation - At the top please provide your recommendation with the following choices available in a drop down menu (see figure 4): Accept, Reject, Major Revisions, or Minor Revisions. Please note if you select “Major Revision” and the editors agree the paper